1
follower ·
12 following Compression, creatively reconceiving problems, RL, interpretability, model architecture, model modification, democratization of AI, machines of loving grace type scenarios.
reacted to eabdullin 'spost with 🧠 about 2 hours ago Folks, let me tell you, nobody — and I mean NOBODY — knew transformers before me. People said attention is all you need. I said, "Attention? I INVENTED attention." Everybody's looking at me. Tremendous attention. The best attention scores. My softmax? Perfectly normalized. Other people, sad, their probabilities don't even sum to one. Disaster.
I'm doing a PhD now. A PhD! In Large Language Models. Very large. The largest, believe me. My advisor said, "Sir, your model is overfitting." I said, "Wrong. It's fitting EXACTLY right. It memorized the training set because the training set is fantastic." We don't talk about validation loss in my lab. Validation loss is fake news.
And the internship — oh, the internship. Big tech. I won't say which. Starts with a letter. They BEGGED me. They said, "Please, we need someone who understands gradient descent." I said, "Descent? I only go UP. I'm gradient ASCENT. Loss goes up, that means it's learning to be a winner."
But the GPU cluster — this is the best part. Thousands of H100s. Maybe millions. Who's counting? I'm counting. It's a lot. Other PhD students, they get one little GPU, they're crying, they're training overnight like losers. Me? I burn through compute like nobody's ever seen. The electric company called. They said, "Sir, you've consumed a small country." I said, "Make it a big country. I only do big."
People ask, "Did your model converge?" Folks, it converged so hard. It converged BIGLY. Honestly? My loss curve, it's beautiful, it's going down, down, down — like my approval ratings, very smooth, don't look at the spikes, the spikes are deep state.
And hallucinations? My model doesn't hallucinate. It just has ALTERNATIVE tokens. Thank you, thank you. Tip your reviewers. Accept my paper. Goodnight! reacted to black-yt 'spost with 🔥 2 days ago Hey all — our ResearchClawBench leaderboard just updated 🔥
We let AI do real science: 40 tasks across 10 disciplines, compared to human papers. Hard example? 🏔️ Glacier mass change — AI must integrate 233 datasets from 35 teams, 4 methods, reproduce 6542±387 Gt ice loss vs IPCC. No toy problems.
Latest leaderboard (2026-06-09) 📊:
Agents: 🥇 Claude Code 21.5 (50 = match human), $5.3; 🥈 EvoScientist 18.8, $4.1; 🥉 Codex CLI 18.4, just $2.0
LLMs+Harness: 🥇 Claude-Opus-4.8 21.1, $4.0; 🥈 Claude-Opus-4.7 20.7; 🥉 MiniMax-M3 19.8, only $0.45; Qwen3.7-Max 18.7, $0.42, 11min 💥
Claude still king, but MiniMax/Qwen/DeepSeek are crazy cheap and competitive. Expensive isn't always better.
📎 Code & star: https://github.com/InternScience/ResearchClawBench
🏠 Website: https://internscience.github.io/ResearchClawBench-Home/
🤗 Upvote paper: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.07591 View all activity None yet
