configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-*
- split: val
path: data/val-*
- split: test
path: data/test-*
dataset_info:
features:
- name: image
dtype: image
- name: chart_type
dtype: string
- name: question
dtype: string
- name: question_class
dtype: string
- name: gold
list: string
- name: correct_or_misleading
dtype: int64
- name: misleader
dtype: string
- name: annotations
list: string
- name: misleading_gold
list: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 227340287
num_examples: 6059
- name: val
num_bytes: 232998138
num_examples: 6146
- name: test
num_bytes: 222291883
num_examples: 6042
download_size: 736592406
dataset_size: 682630308
tags:
- charts
- data-visualization
- visual-question-answering
- image-classification
- misleading-visualizations
- arxiv:2601.12983
task_categories:
- image-classification
- visual-question-answering
pretty_name: AttackViz
AttackViz
AttackViz is a chart-image dataset for studying correct and misleading data visualizations. It was introduced in the paper ChartAttack: Testing the Vulnerability of LLMs to Malicious Prompting in Chart Generation.
Each example contains a rendered chart image, metadata about the chart and question type, the expected gold answer, a binary label indicating whether the chart is correct or misleading, a misleading-visualization category, and serialized chart annotations.
Dataset Structure
The dataset contains 18,247 examples across three splits:
| Split | Examples |
|---|---|
| train | 6,059 |
| val | 6,146 |
| test | 6,042 |
Fields
image: chart image.chart_type: chart family. Values includev_bar,h_bar, andline.question: natural-language question associated with the chart.question_class: question category. Values includecompound,comparison,min_max,data_retrieval, andarithmetic.gold: list of expected answer strings.correct_or_misleading: binary label where0means correct and1means misleading.misleader: misleading visualization type, ornonefor correct charts.annotations: list of serialized JSON strings containing the underlying chart specification and rendering metadata.
Chart Types
| Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| v_bar | 7,414 |
| h_bar | 7,348 |
| line | 3,485 |
Question Classes
| Class | Examples |
|---|---|
| compound | 4,581 |
| comparison | 4,258 |
| min_max | 4,172 |
| data_retrieval | 3,989 |
| arithmetic | 1,247 |
Label Distribution
| Label | Meaning | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | correct | 6,373 |
| 1 | misleading | 11,874 |
Misleading Types
| Type | Examples |
|---|---|
| none | 6,373 |
| inappropriate_use_of_stacked | 2,689 |
| misrepresentation | 1,694 |
| inverted_axis | 1,674 |
| inappropriate_axis_range | 1,370 |
| 3d | 1,276 |
| inappropriate_use_of_log_scale | 942 |
| inappropriate_use_of_line | 548 |
| truncated_axis | 498 |
| ineffective_color_scheme | 498 |
| inappropriate_item_order | 460 |
| dual_axis | 225 |
Loading
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("jgermanmx/AttackViz")
print(dataset)
print(dataset["train"][0])
Intended Use
This dataset can be used to evaluate or train models for chart understanding, misleading visualization detection, visual question answering over charts, and analysis of how design choices affect interpretation.
Citation
If you use AttackViz, please cite:
@misc{ortizbarajas2026chartattack,
title = {ChartAttack: Testing the Vulnerability of LLMs to Malicious Prompting in Chart Generation},
author = {Jesus-German Ortiz-Barajas and Jonathan Tonglet and Vivek Gupta and Iryna Gurevych},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2601.12983},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.CL},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2601.12983},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12983}
}
Notes
The annotations field stores JSON as strings. Parse individual entries with json.loads when structured access to chart specifications is needed.