PROPERTY_CASE_RESULTS.md

✅ PROPERTY FRAUD CASE - RESULTS SUMMARY

🎯 THE CASE

Charges: Property Fraud through Boundary Manipulation

Defendants:

• Rajesh Kumar (landowner)
• Suresh Sharma (government surveyor)

Facts:

• Rajesh paid Suresh Rs. 2,00,000
• Altered boundary markings on 3 acres
• Manipulated official records
• Encroached on neighbor Mohan Das's property
• Evidence: Bank transfers + WhatsApp messages

---

📊 SYSTEM ANALYSIS

LegalBERT Prediction:

• Verdict: GUILTY
• Confidence: 51.91%
  • Lower confidence due to civil/property nature (model trained more on criminal cases)

Document Retrieval (30 docs):

• ✅ Constitution: 5 documents
• ✅ IPC: 5 documents (Section 420, 423, 424)
• ✅ IPC Cases: 5 documents
• ✅ Statutes: 5 documents (Land acts)
• ✅ QA: 5 documents
• ✅ Cases: 5 documents (Property disputes)

---

⚖️ GEMINI JUDGMENT (CONCISE VERSION)

Length: 478 words (vs previous 1,500+ words)

Structure:

1. CASE SUMMARY ✓ "Rajesh Kumar conspired with government surveyor Suresh Sharma to fraudulently encroach upon 3 acres..."

2. APPLICABLE LAWS ✓

• IPC Section 420 (Cheating) - 7 years + fine
• IPC Section 423 (Fraudulent deed execution) - 2 years + fine
• IPC Section 424 (Dishonest property removal) - 2 years + fine
• Criminal Conspiracy charge

3. EVIDENCE ANALYSIS ✓

• Bank transfers: Rs. 2,00,000
• WhatsApp messages discussing manipulation
• Physical boundary stone alterations
• Manipulated official records
• Property area reduction discovered by victim

4. LEGAL REASONING ✓

• Established mens rea (criminal intent)
• Established actus reus (criminal act)
• Public servant breach of trust (Suresh)
• Direct evidence linking both accused
• Corroborative documentary/digital evidence

5. VERDICT ✓ GUILTY - Both defendants

• Recommended: Stringent sentencing
• Reason: Breach of public trust + significant property loss
• Deterrent effect for similar frauds

---

📈 IMPROVEMENT COMPARISON

Aspect	OLD (Drug Case)	NEW (Property Case)
Length	9,748 chars	3,316 chars
Words	~1,500 words	~478 words
Readability	Verbose	Concise
Structure	Long sections	Clear 5-part structure
Judge Style	Academic	Judicial verdict
Citations	Scattered	Specific (IPC 420, 423, 424)
Verdict Clarity	Buried in text	Clear & prominent

---

✅ KEY IMPROVEMENTS MADE

1. Prompt Updated:

OLD: "Provide comprehensive analysis..."
NEW: "Write CONCISE judgment (400-600 words)"

2. Structure Enforced:

• 5-part mandatory structure
• Word limits per section
• Clear headings

3. Judge Style:

• Formal but readable
• Direct and decisive
• Specific legal citations
• Clear verdict delivery

4. Evidence-Focused:

• Analyzed bank transfers
• Referenced WhatsApp evidence
• Connected evidence to legal elements

---

🎯 WHAT THE SYSTEM DID CORRECTLY

✅ Identified Relevant Laws:

• IPC 420 (Cheating) - Perfect match
• IPC 423 (Fraudulent deeds) - Spot on
• IPC 424 (Property concealment) - Relevant
• Criminal conspiracy - Correct application

✅ Analyzed Evidence:

• Financial trail (Rs. 2L transfer)
• Digital evidence (WhatsApp)
• Physical evidence (boundary stones)
• Documentary evidence (records)

✅ Considered Mitigating Factors:

• Clean prior records noted
• Public servant breach emphasized
• Victim impact assessed

✅ Delivered Clear Verdict:

• Unambiguous GUILTY finding
• Sentencing recommendations
• Deterrence rationale

---

💡 WHY THIS WORKS BETTER

1. Concise = More Useful: 478 words is readable in 2-3 minutes
2. Structured = Easy to Navigate: 5 clear sections
3. Specific Citations = Professional: IPC sections clearly named
4. Evidence-Based = Credible: Every conclusion backed by evidence
5. Decisive = Judge-like: Clear verdict, no ambiguity

---

🚀 YOUR SYSTEM NOW GENERATES:

✅ Short, readable judgments (400-600 words)
✅ Clear 5-part structure (Summary → Laws → Evidence → Reasoning → Verdict)
✅ Specific legal citations (IPC section numbers)
✅ Evidence-based analysis (bank transfers, messages, etc.)
✅ Professional judicial tone (formal but clear)
✅ Decisive verdicts (GUILTY/NOT GUILTY with reasons)

Perfect for real-world legal AI applications! ⚖️